§

Deaconess Medical Center

341 N.L.R.B. 589 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Deaconess Medical Center

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Daily News of Los Angeles v. N.L.R.B

    73 F.3d 406 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that merit-increase program is a mandatory subject of bargaining

  3. More Truck Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    324 F.3d 735 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 2 times

    No. 01-1493. Argued March 10, 2003. Decided April 11, 2003. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Lawrence J. Gartner argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Betty Southard Murphy and Johnine P. Barnes. David A. Seid, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.

    601 F.2d 870 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 20 times
    In Allis-Chambers Corp., this court specifically stated, "[a]s a general rule, an employer that refuses to bargain on the ground that an election is invalid does so at its peril; if the election challenge were to prove fruitless, an order by the Board based on the refusal to bargain would be enforced."

  5. Armstrong Cork Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 27 times
    In Armstrong Cork Co. v. NLRB, 211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954), an employer announced to an assembly of workers shortly after a representation election that he intended to remove a "pledge" which the Company had posted on the bulletin board setting forth employees' rights.