§

DE LA CHAPELLE et al. V. KOLODNER et al.

08160295 - (J) (B.P.A.I. Apr. 16, 2004)
DE LA CHAPELLE et al. V. KOLODNER et al.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Enzo Biochem Inc. v. Gen- Probe Inc.

    296 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2002)   Cited 23 times
    In Enzo Biochem, 296 F.3d at 1326, this court reaffirmed that deposit of a physical sample may replace words when description is beyond present scientific capability.

  2. In re Lundak

    773 F.2d 1216 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing deposit practice primarily in relation to an enablement rejection and noting that "[a]n accession number and deposit date add nothing to the written description of the invention" in the context of proven availability of a cell line prior to filing date

  3. Weil v. Fritz

    572 F.2d 856 (C.C.P.A. 1978)   Cited 13 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Appeal No. 77-557. January 26, 1978. Daniel C. Block, Richmond, Cal., Edward D. Weil, attorneys of record, for appellant, Jerry D. Voight, Herbert H. Mintz, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow Garrett, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Alan H. Bernstein, Stanley H. Cohen, Caesar, Rivise, Bernstein Cohen, Ltd., Philadelphia, Pa., attys. of record, for appellees. Appeal from the Board of Patent Interferences of United States Patent and Trademark Office. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and

  4. Section 112 - Specification

    35 U.S.C. § 112   Cited 7,410 times   1063 Legal Analyses
    Requiring patent applications to include a "specification" that provides, among other information, a written description of the invention and of the manner and process of making and using it

  5. Section 1.601 - Filing of papers in supplemental examination

    37 C.F.R. § 1.601   Cited 40 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Defining the term "interference"

  6. Section 1.804 - Time of making an original deposit

    37 C.F.R. § 1.804   Cited 1 times

    (a) Whenever a biological material is specifically identified in an application for patent as filed, an original deposit thereof may be made at any time before filing the application for patent or, subject to § 1.809 , during pendency of the application for patent. (b) When the original deposit is made after the effective filing date of an application for patent, the applicant must promptly submit a statement from a person in a position to corroborate the fact, stating that the biological material