§

Dayton Hudson Corp.

314 N.L.R.B. 795 (N.L.R.B. 1994)
Dayton Hudson Corp.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. N.L.R.B

    736 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 29 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. NLRB, 736 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1984), we stated "[t]here may be cases where no forgery can be proved, but where the misrepresentation is so pervasive and the deception so artful that employees will be unable to separate truth from untruth and where their right to a free and fair choice will be affected."

  2. Dayton Hudson Dept. Store v. N.L.R.B

    987 F.2d 359 (6th Cir. 1993)   Cited 11 times
    In Dayton Hudson, a letter with substantial misrepresentations was mailed to employees three days before the election, the writers of the letter were known to be allied with the union, but, unlike here, the union won by a significant margin.

  3. Bell Foundry Co. v. N.L.R.B

    827 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 86-7118, 86-7155. Argued and Submitted January 7, 1987. Decided September 15, 1987. James G. Johnson and Susan L. Schwartz, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner/cross-respondent. Kenneth B. Hipp, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent/cross-petitioner. Petition for Review from a Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before KENNEDY and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and LOVELL, District Judge. Honorable Charles C. Lovell, United States District Judge, District of