§

DAYTON HEIDELBERG DISTRIBUTING CO. A/K/A HEIDELBERG DISTRIBUTING COMPANY

09-CA-156105 (N.L.R.B. Jun. 8, 2016)
DAYTON HEIDELBERG DISTRIBUTING CO. A/K/A HEIDELBERG DISTRIBUTING COMPANY

5 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,693 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. General Fabrications Corp.

    222 F.3d 218 (6th Cir. 2000)   Cited 25 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding the NLRB is entitled to summary enforcement of unchallenged portions of orders

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Electra-Food Machinery, Inc.

    621 F.2d 956 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that employer overstepped its role when it refused to enter into written collective bargaining agreement because it believed union's entering the deal would violate union constitution

  5. Int'l Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B

    626 F.2d 119 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 2 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. NLRB, 626 F.2d 119 (9th Cir. 1980), we held that a union could not refuse to sell unemployment stamps — which employees off the payroll could use in lieu of regular dues to non-members.