Day & Zimmermann NPS, Inc.
7 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.
465 U.S. 822 (1984) Cited 206 times 9 Legal AnalysesHolding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection
Labor Board v. Burnup Sims
379 U.S. 21 (1964) Cited 106 times 21 Legal AnalysesFinding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
Prill v. N.L.R.B
755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985) Cited 80 times 3 Legal AnalysesIn Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thor Power Tool Co.
351 F.2d 584 (7th Cir. 1965) Cited 68 timesConcluding that "when the entire record is considered there was substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that [employee's] discharge was the result of his having presented a grievance to the management" even though employee was overheard referring to company's superintendent as "the horse's ass" and was thereafter summarily discharged
Prill v. N.L.R.B
835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987) Cited 27 times 8 Legal AnalysesRecognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”
Felix Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
251 F.3d 1051 (D.C. Cir. 2001) Cited 6 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn Felix, an employee telephoned his supervisor to inquire about additional wages the employer owed him for working night shifts.
American M. In. Co. v. Lorentzen
932 F.2d 958 (3d Cir. 1991) Cited 6 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn Bentz v. American Red Cross, 932 F.2d 958 (3d Cir. 1991), we summarily affirmed a jury verdict against the Red Cross.