§

Dawson Metal Products, Inc.

183 N.L.R.B. 191 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
Dawson Metal Products, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  4. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tennessee Packers, Inc.

    379 F.2d 172 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 77 times
    Hearing on objections is required only if substantial factual questions are raised by objections

  6. Irving Air Chute Company v. N.L.R.B

    350 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times
    In Irving Air Chute Co. v. N.L.R.B., 2 Cir., 350 F.2d 176, 182, the Court in allowing enforcement of the Board's order cited many cases for the proposition, "`It is for the Board not the courts to determine how the effect of prior unfair labor practices may be expunged'."

  7. Allegheny Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. N.L.R.B

    312 F.2d 529 (3d Cir. 1962)   Cited 21 times

    No. 13960. Argued November 2, 1962. Decided December 26, 1962. Robert Lewis, New York City, (Jackson Lewis, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner. Standau E. Weinbrecht, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Nancy M. Sherman, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for respondent. Before KALODNER, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Dal-Tex Optical Company

    310 F.2d 58 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 17 times
    In NLRB v. Dal-Tex Optical Co., 310 F.2d 58, 60-61 (CA5 1962), the court sustained the Board, 131 N.L.R.B. 715, 721 (1961), in affording protection to an employee, Whitaker, who appeared but did not testify at a Board hearing.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Fashion Fair, Inc.

    399 F.2d 764 (6th Cir. 1968)

    No. 17894. July 30, 1968. Julius Rosenbaum, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Jonas Katz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondents; Kasfir, Heckerman Hood, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief. Before McCREE and COMBS, Circuit Judges, and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge. CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge. This cause is before the Court upon