§

Davis Industries, Inc.

232 N.L.R.B. 946 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Davis Industries, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  2. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  3. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

  4. Local No. 150, International Union of Operating Engineers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    480 F.2d 1186 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 29 times

    No. 71-1689. June 20, 1973. Bernard M. Baum, Daniel S. Shulman, Robert H. Baum, Chicago, Ill., and J. Albert Woll, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for petitioner. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., at the time the brief was filed, Charles N. Steele, and Alan D. Cirker, Washington, D.C., Attys., N.L.R.B., were on the brief for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before McGOWAN, Circuit Judge, and WINTER

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Irvin

    475 F.2d 1265 (3d Cir. 1973)   Cited 28 times
    Denying enforcement of a bargaining order in light of length of time between end of projects to which order applied and court's decision

  6. Local Union No. 103, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    535 F.2d 87 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 5 times
    In Iron Workers the Supreme Court pointed out that one reason their interpretation of section 8(f) does not render that section meaningless is that section 8(f) is similar to section 8(e), and section 8(e) has been interpreted so that it, too, cannot be enforced by economic coercion.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hudson Motor Car

    128 F.2d 528 (6th Cir. 1942)   Cited 29 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Hudson Motor Car Co., 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 528, 533, it was stated: "We think it right and just to say that so far as the record shows, respondent has not wilfully violated the provisions of the Act, but the intent of the employer is not within the ambit of our power of review.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Star Pub. Co.

    97 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1938)   Cited 23 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Star Publishing Co., 9 Cir., 97 F.2d 465, branch managers were held to be employees, while in National Labor Relations Board v. American Potash Chemical Corp., 9 Cir., 98 F.2d 488, a foreman was reinstated upon the ground that he had been unfairly discharged.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys