§

David J. Jorczak, Complainant, v. Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

0120103111 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 12, 2012)
David J. Jorczak, Complainant, v. Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 51,673 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions

  2. Section 794 - Nondiscrimination under Federal grants and programs

    29 U.S.C. § 794   Cited 12,390 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Adopting ADA standards for Rehabilitation Act claims

  3. Section 791 - Employment of individuals with disabilities

    29 U.S.C. § 791   Cited 2,276 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Adopting standards for ADA claims under § 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, including 42 U.S.C. § 12112, which forbids discrimination "against a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability . . ."

  4. Section 1630.2 - Definitions

    29 C.F.R. § 1630.2   Cited 8,356 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding that major life activity is substantially limited if plaintiff is "significantly restricted in the ability to perform either a class of jobs or a broad range of jobs in various classes as compared to the average person having comparable training, skills and abilities"

  5. Appendix to Part 1630 - Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act

    29 C.F.R. § 1630 app to Part 1630   Cited 860 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether an individual is substantially limited in a major life activity entails the nature and severity of the impairment; the duration or expected duration of the impairment; and the permanent or long term impact

  6. Section 1630.9 - Not making reasonable accommodation

    29 C.F.R. § 1630.9   Cited 464 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Providing that if an “individual rejects a reasonable accommodation . . . and cannot, as a result of that rejection, perform the essential functions of the position, the individual will not be considered qualified”

  7. Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.405   Cited 81 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"