David J. Deacy v. Michelle D. Kraft
3 Cited authorities
Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH & ERBE USA v. Canady Technology LLC
629 F.3d 1278 (Fed. Cir. 2010) Cited 64 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the color blue for endoscopic probes was functional because its contrast with human tissue made the probe more visible through an endoscopic camera
Action Temporary Services v. Labor Force
870 F.2d 1563 (Fed. Cir. 1989) Cited 10 timesNo. 88-1446. March 23, 1989. J. Rodman Steele, Steele, Gould Fried, Philadelphia, Pa., argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Gregory A. Nelson. Jonathan E. Jobe, Jr., Hubbard, Thurman, Turner Tucker, Dallas, Tex., argued for appellee. With him on the brief was Molly Buck Richard. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before RICH, SMITH and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges. EDWARD S. SMITH, Circuit Judge. In this concurrent use proceeding, the
Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration
15 U.S.C. § 1052 Cited 1,610 times 274 Legal AnalysesGranting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"