David J. Baker, Complainant, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 241,266 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 220,657 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  3. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins

    490 U.S. 228 (1989)   Cited 4,648 times   162 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer discriminated on the basis of sex when he "act[ed] on the basis of a belief that a woman cannot be aggressive, or that she must not be"
  4. Smith v. City of Salem

    378 F.3d 566 (6th Cir. 2004)   Cited 706 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Title VII prohibits sex stereotyping
  5. Nichols v. Azteca Rest. Enters., Inc.

    256 F.3d 864 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 569 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer liable where its "solution" failed "to deter future harassment"
  6. Higgins v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.

    194 F.3d 252 (1st Cir. 1999)   Cited 541 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when an employee with a disability is injured by his employer's failure to provide a reasonable accommodation, no additional showing of animus against persons with disabilities is required for ADA liability
  7. Prowel v. Wise Bus. Forms, Inc.

    579 F.3d 285 (3d Cir. 2009)   Cited 167 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Title VII protects a gay man for deviating from gender stereotypes but not for his sexual orientation
  8. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 5,026 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"