§

David H. Ward, Complainant, v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.

01973627 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 20, 2000)
David H. Ward, Complainant, v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.

5 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Scheffer

    523 U.S. 303 (1998)   Cited 1,988 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the blanket exclusion of polygraph evidence didn't violate the right to present a defense, as the law was "a rational and proportional means of advancing the legitimate interest in barring unreliable evidence"

  2. Department of Navy v. Egan

    484 U.S. 518 (1988)   Cited 520 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "unless Congress specifically has provided otherwise," "outside nonexpert bod[ies]," including courts, cannot attempt to substitute their judgments for those of the executive branch on matters of national security

  3. Prewitt v. United States Postal Service

    662 F.2d 292 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 292 times
    Concluding in a Rehabilitation Act case involving employment discrimination that the employer has the burden of persuasion on the issue of reasonable accommodation

  4. Ryan v. Reno

    168 F.3d 520 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 69 times
    Holding that “under Egan an adverse employment action based on denial or revocation of a security clearance is not actionable under Title VII”

  5. Appendix to Part 1630 - Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act

    29 C.F.R. § 1630 app to Part 1630   Cited 860 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether an individual is substantially limited in a major life activity entails the nature and severity of the impairment; the duration or expected duration of the impairment; and the permanent or long term impact