§

David Friedland Painting Co., Inc.

158 N.L.R.B. 571 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
David Friedland Painting Co., Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

  2. American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

    380 U.S. 300 (1965)   Cited 350 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

  3. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  4. Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union

    353 U.S. 87 (1957)   Cited 197 times
    Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947

  5. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  6. Cusano v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    190 F.2d 898 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 35 times

    No. 10404. Argued May 22, 1951. Filed August 16, 1951. Samuel J. Davidson, Hoboken, N.J. (DeFazio, Davidson DeFazio, Hoboken, N.J., on the brief), for petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mark C. Curran, Washington, D.C., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. This case is

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Indus. Cotton Mills

    208 F.2d 87 (4th Cir. 1953)   Cited 21 times

    No. 6635. Argued October 20, 1953. Decided November 9, 1953. Bernard Dunau, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Lewis C. Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Pierce Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, DOBIE, Circuit Judge, and WILKIN, District Judge. DOBIE, Circuit Judge

  8. Detroit Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    346 F.2d 527 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 15722, 15743. June 3, 1965. Daniel J. Tindall, Jr., Lawrence M. Kelly, Dickinson, Wright, McKean Cudlip, Detroit, Mich., for Detroit Newspaper Publishers. Clifford W. Van Blarcom, Philip T. Van Zile, Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust Kennedy, Detroit, Mich., for Evening News Assn. Kenneth Murray, Detroit, Mich., for Knight Newspapers. David Leo Uelmen, Goldberg, Previant Uelmen, Milwaukee, Wis., for Newspaper Drivers Handlers' etc. Jules H. Gordon, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General

  9. Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    270 F.2d 40 (3d Cir. 1959)   Cited 11 times
    In Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. NLRB, 270 F.2d 40, 43 (3d Cir. 1959), the court, in sustaining the Board's finding that a shut-down by the employer was not motivated by a fear that a sudden strike would endanger plant and personnel, stated that "to apply hindsight in the light of what later occurred would not be a true assessment of the company's motives.

  10. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    162 F.2d 435 (7th Cir. 1947)   Cited 18 times
    In Allis-Chalmers the employer downgraded the status of plant inspectors after they had voted to join a union, and it was apparent that the employer acted only because of the inspectors' membership in the union.