§
David Allen Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Pierce v. Underwood

    487 U.S. 552 (1988)   Cited 9,295 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when Congress reenacts a statute without changing its language, and when there is no indication that “Congress thought it was doing anything ... except reenacting and making permanent” the earlier legislation, a court should not give weight to legislative history pertaining to the reenactment

  2. M.P.C. Plating, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    953 F.2d 1018 (6th Cir. 1992)   Cited 1 times

    No. 91-5608. Argued November 22, 1991. Decided January 14, 1992. William L.S. Ross briefed and argued, Donald F. Woodcock briefed, Calfee, Halter Griswold, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Eric G. Moskowitz briefed, Margery E. Lieber, Dean L. Burrell argued, N.L.R.B., Office of the Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Frederick Calatrello, Director, N.L.R.B., Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board

  3. Section 504 - Costs and fees of parties

    5 U.S.C. § 504   Cited 657 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing payment of attorney's fees by the Government when a party prevails in a federal agency adjudication

  4. Section 102.143 - "Adversary adjudication" defined; entitlement to award; eligibility for award

    29 C.F.R. § 102.143   Cited 2 times

    (a) The term adversary adjudication, as used in this subpart, means unfair labor practice proceedings pending before the Board on a complaint and backpay proceedings under §§ 102.52 through 102.59 pending before the Board on a Notice of Hearing at any time after October 1, 1984. (b) A Respondent in an adversary adjudication who prevails in that proceeding, or in a significant and discrete substantive portion of that proceeding, and who otherwise meets the eligibility requirements of this section