Darlington Manufacturing Co.

24 Cited authorities

United States v. Price
383 U.S. 787 (1966) Cited 1,099 times
Holding that the revisers significantly broadened the forerunner of 18 U.S.C. § 242
United States v. Guest
383 U.S. 745 (1966) Cited 585 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court erred in dismissing part of an indictment concerning a private conspiracy to prevent African–American citizens from using state highways
Labor Board v. Brown
380 U.S. 278 (1965) Cited 473 times 2 Legal Analyses
Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"
Ginzburg v. United States
383 U.S. 463 (1966) Cited 387 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding unprotected material that was "created, represented and sold solely as a claimed instrument of the sexual stimulation it would bring"
American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board
380 U.S. 300 (1965) Cited 351 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful
Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.
373 U.S. 221 (1963) Cited 359 times 1 Legal Analyses
Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 471 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 535 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
Machinists Local v. Labor Board
362 U.S. 411 (1960) Cited 276 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

Darlington Manufacturing Co.

24 Cited authorities

Holding that the revisers significantly broadened the forerunner of 18 U.S.C. § 242

Holding that the district court erred in dismissing part of an indictment concerning a private conspiracy to prevent African–American citizens from using state highways

Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

Finding unprotected material that was "created, represented and sold solely as a claimed instrument of the sexual stimulation it would bring"

Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely