Darlington Manufacturing Co.

53 Cited authorities

Edison Co. v. Labor Board
305 U.S. 197 (1938) Cited 19,306 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay
Labor Board v. Laughlin
301 U.S. 1 (1937) Cited 1,499 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis
Garner v. Teamsters Union
346 U.S. 485 (1953) Cited 690 times 2 Legal Analyses
In Garner the emphasis was not on two conflicting labor statutes but rather on two similar remedies, one state and one federal, brought to bear on precisely the same conduct.
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 871 times
Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota
358 U.S. 450 (1959) Cited 415 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that neither the Commerce Clause nor the Due Process Clause of United States Constitution prevent states from taxing net income of an interstate business that is "earned from and fairly apportioned to business activities within the taxing State"
Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.
344 U.S. 344 (1953) Cited 368 times
Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding
Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
348 U.S. 468 (1955) Cited 315 times
Involving state injunction of a strike and peaceful picketing
Virginia Electric Co. v. Board
319 U.S. 533 (1943) Cited 326 times
Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"
Hitchman Coal Coke Co. v. Mitchell
245 U.S. 229 (1917) Cited 463 times
In Hitchman Coal Coke Co. v. Mitchell, 245 U.S. 229, 262 (1917), this Court struck the portions of a decree enjoining a union from picketing and physical violence because there was no evidence that either of these forms of interference was threatened.
Associated Press v. Labor Board
301 U.S. 103 (1937) Cited 257 times
Holding that the Associated Press's not-for-profit newsgathering activities "amount[ed] to commercial intercourse . . . within the meaning of the Constitution" because it "involve[d] the constant use of channels of interstate . . . communication"

Darlington Manufacturing Co.

53 Cited authorities

Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis

In Garner the emphasis was not on two conflicting labor statutes but rather on two similar remedies, one state and one federal, brought to bear on precisely the same conduct.

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

Holding that neither the Commerce Clause nor the Due Process Clause of United States Constitution prevent states from taxing net income of an interstate business that is "earned from and fairly apportioned to business activities within the taxing State"

Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

Involving state injunction of a strike and peaceful picketing

Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

In Hitchman Coal Coke Co. v. Mitchell, 245 U.S. 229, 262 (1917), this Court struck the portions of a decree enjoining a union from picketing and physical violence because there was no evidence that either of these forms of interference was threatened.

Holding that the Associated Press's not-for-profit newsgathering activities "amount[ed] to commercial intercourse . . . within the meaning of the Constitution" because it "involve[d] the constant use of channels of interstate . . . communication"