§

Dareltech, LLC

IPR2019-01528 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 28, 2020)
Dareltech, LLC

3 Cited authorities

  1. Dareltech, LLC v. Samsung Elecs. Co.

    Civil Action No. 4:18cv702 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2020)

    Civil Action No. 4:18cv702 03-16-2020 DARELTECH, LLC, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ET AL. Judge Mazzant MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Dareltech, LLC's ("Plaintiff" or "Dareltech") Claim Construction Opening Brief (Dkt. #38), Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s ("Defendant" or "Samsung") Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. #39), and Plaintiff's Claim Construction Reply Brief (Dkt. #45). Also before the Court are the parties' October 1, 2019 Joint

  2. Section 317 - Settlement

    35 U.S.C. § 317   Cited 37 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Addressing continuation of IPR as to some petitioners after dismissal of others

  3. Section 42.74 - Settlement

    37 C.F.R. § 42.74   Cited 3 times   13 Legal Analyses

    (a)Board role. The parties may agree to settle any issue in a proceeding, but the Board is not a party to the settlement and may independently determine any question of jurisdiction, patentability, or Office practice. (b)Agreements in writing. Any agreement or understanding between the parties made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of a proceeding shall be in writing and a true copy shall be filed with the Board before the termination of the trial. (c)Request to keep separate