§

Daniel International Corp.

276 N.L.R.B. 1093 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
Daniel International Corp.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Haberman Const. Co.

    641 F.2d 351 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 103 times
    Holding that the employer "manifested an intent to abide by the . . . contract by enjoying its benefits and abiding by its provisions"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  4. Nabors v. N.L.R.B

    323 F.2d 686 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 59 times
    Holding that NLRB acts in public capacity and “[t]he fact that these proceedings operate to confer an incidental benefit on private persons does not detract from this public purpose”

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Daniel Const. Co.

    731 F.2d 191 (4th Cir. 1984)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that contemporaneous section 8 violations provide evidence of an employer's anti-union animus in the discharge of a particular employee

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company

    360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 51 times
    Permitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Laredo Packing Co.

    730 F.2d 405 (5th Cir. 1984)   Cited 18 times
    Stating that we may reject the NLRB's credibility determination where it is unreasonable or is based on inadequate reasons

  8. United States Pipe and Foundry Co. v. N.L.R.B

    398 F.2d 544 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 23 times

    No. 24837. July 23, 1968. John J. Coleman, Jr., A. Henry Gaede, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for petitioner; Allen Poppleton, Bradley, Arant, Rose White, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel. Benj. L. Erdreich, Birmingham, Ala., Michael Gottesman, Washington, D.C., Bernard Kleinman, Chicago, Ill., Elliot Bredhoff, George H. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Jerome Cooper, Birmingham, Ala., for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William F. Wachter, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Madison Courier, Inc.

    505 F.2d 391 (D.C. Cir. 1974)   Cited 8 times

    No. 24808. Argued June 5, 1974. Decided October 11, 1974. Allen H. Feldman, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Robert A. Giannasi, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., at the time the record was filed, also entered an appearance for petitioner. Herbert C. Snyder, Jr., Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Isis Plumbing & Heating Co.

    322 F.2d 913 (9th Cir. 1963)   Cited 18 times

    No. 18364. September 23, 1963. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles and Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould and Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before HAMLEY, JERTBERG and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. JERTBERG, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter

  11. Section 206 - Minimum wage

    29 U.S.C. § 206   Cited 9,057 times   101 Legal Analyses
    Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”