§

Daniel Finley Allen & Co.

303 N.L.R.B. 846 (N.L.R.B. 1991)
Daniel Finley Allen & Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Murray Products, Inc.

    584 F.2d 934 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 18 times
    Noting that the Board has often held such short response times invalid under the Act

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Pace Oldsmobile, Inc.

    739 F.2d 108 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 12 times
    Vacating bargaining order without remand where Board provided only conclusory analysis

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Acme Wire Works, Inc.

    582 F.2d 153 (2d Cir. 1978)   Cited 13 times

    No. 505, Docket 77-4149. Argued April 10, 1978. Decided June 30, 1978. Standau E. Weinbrecht, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Linda Dreeben, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner. Stanley Israel, New York City (Bluestone, Kliegman Israel, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor

  6. Southwest Regional Jt. Bd., v. N.L.R.B

    441 F.2d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 17 times
    Finding that the "proper question `is not whether an employee actually felt intimidated but whether the employer engaged in conduct which may reasonably be said to tend to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act'" (quoting Joy Silk Mills, supra, 185 F.2d at 743-44)

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Consolidated Dress Carriers

    693 F.2d 277 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 3 times
    Characterizing the General Counsel's Mastro Plastics burden as an "initial obligation to produce the employees to testify"

  8. Donovan v. N.L.R.B

    520 F.2d 1316 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 9 times
    Finding union members' mass picketing, threats, assaults and some property damage insufficient to sustain the "extraordinary sanction of withholding an otherwise appropriate remedial bargaining order"

  9. Cuneo v. United Shoe Workers of America, Etc.

    181 F. Supp. 324 (D.N.J. 1960)   Cited 6 times

    Civ. No. 100-60. February 26, 1960. Jacques Schurre, of National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rothbard, Harris Oxfeld, Newark, N.J., Cooper, Ostrin DeVarco, Eugene N. Sosnoff, New York City, for respondents. MEANEY, District Judge. This proceeding is before the court on a petition filed on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board (Board herein), pursuant to Section 10 (l) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended ( 61 Stat. 149, 73 Stat. 544, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160