§

Dan Howard Mfg. Co.

158 N.L.R.B. 805 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Dan Howard Mfg. Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Corp.

    303 U.S. 41 (1938)   Cited 1,426 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that exhaustion of administrative remedies mandated before seeking injunctive relief in court

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. Labor Board v. Steelworkers

    357 U.S. 357 (1958)   Cited 72 times
    In United Steelworkers, the Court warned that the NLRA "does not command that labor organizations as a matter of abstract law, under all circumstances, be protected in the use of every possible means of reaching the minds of individual workers, nor that they are entitled to use a medium of communication simply because the employer is using it."

  4. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  5. Irving Air Chute Company v. N.L.R.B

    350 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times
    In Irving Air Chute Co. v. N.L.R.B., 2 Cir., 350 F.2d 176, 182, the Court in allowing enforcement of the Board's order cited many cases for the proposition, "`It is for the Board not the courts to determine how the effect of prior unfair labor practices may be expunged'."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Peterson Brothers, Inc.

    342 F.2d 221 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 20 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Peterson Brothers, Inc., 5 Cir., 342 F.2d 221, the question arose in the following manner: The union requested recognition from the employer at a time that the union had in its possession cards signed by a majority of its employees.

  7. Local No. 152 v. N.L.R.B

    343 F.2d 307 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 13 times
    In Local No. 152 there was evidence (1) that the union honestly but mistakenly believed it represented a majority of the employees in the unit when it sought recognition, and one week thereafter actually attained majority status, (2) the company responded that it was not interested in talking to the union, (3) the company did not in any manner dispute the union's claim of majority representation, (4) the company ignored the union's demand for recognition, and (5) the union petitioned the Board for an election.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Mid-West Towel Linen Serv., Inc.

    339 F.2d 958 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 13 times

    No. 14482. November 4, 1964. Rehearing Denied December 29, 1964, en banc. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Joseph C. Thackery, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., Leland B. Cross, Jr., Indianapolis, Ind., John B. Beasley, White, Haymond, Pierce, Beasley Gilkison, Muncie, Ind., Ice, Miller, Donadio Ryan, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent

  9. Cherrin Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    349 F.2d 1001 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 12 times
    In Cherrin, this Court deferred to the Board's finding of a special status in a circumstance in which multiple benefits flowed to an employee by virtue of her familial relationship to management.

  10. International Un. of El., R. M. v. N.L.R.B

    352 F.2d 361 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 12 times
    Concurring opinion of Judge Burger