§

Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen Etc.

124 N.L.R.B. 696 (N.L.R.B. 1959)
Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen Etc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Gen. Drivers, Etc

    225 F.2d 205 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 43 times

    No. 15305. August 2, 1955. Miss Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., N.L.R.B., Silver Springs, Md., Owsley Vose, Asso. Ch. Enf. Br., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Cnsl., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Samuel M. Singer, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Chris Dixie, Houston, Tex., Mullinax Wells, Dallas, Tex., Dixie, Ryan Schulman, Houston, Tex., for respondents. Before RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DAWKINS and DE VANE, District Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Assoc. Musicians

    226 F.2d 900 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 39 times

    No. 35, Docket 23550. Argued October 5, 1955. Decided November 3, 1955. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. David I. Ashe, New York City (Ashe Rifkin, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges. CLARK,

  3. National Labor Rel. Board v. Baltimore T. Co.

    140 F.2d 51 (4th Cir. 1944)   Cited 57 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Baltimore T. Co., 4 Cir., 140 F.2d 51, the court alluded with apparent approval to the fact that the Board had endeavored to avoid making its sanctions operate retroactively.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Truck Drivers

    228 F.2d 791 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 22 times

    No. 15651. January 17, 1956. Irving M. Herman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Fred W. Elarbee, Jr., Edwin M. Pearce, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., Poole, Pearce Hall, Atlanta, Ga., for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and BROWN, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit

  5. West Texas Utilities v. National Labor R. BD

    184 F.2d 233 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In West Texas Utilities Co. v. National Labor R. Bd., 87 U.S.App.D.C. 179, 184 F.2d 233, 239, the District of Columbia Court said: "The failure of union officers to comply with 9(h) does not in any way relieve an employer of the paramount obligation to bargain collectively in good faith.

  6. Brewery Wkrs. L. Un. No. 67 v. N.L.R.B

    220 F.2d 380 (D.C. Cir. 1955)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 12115, 12207. Argued December 3, 1954. Decided March 10, 1955. Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Thomas X. Dunn, William J. Walsh and Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., were on the briefs, for petitioner in No. 12,115. Mr. Earle K. Shawe and Mr. William J. Rosenthal, a member of the bar of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Allan Kamerow, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for Washington

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Denver Bldg

    193 F.2d 421 (10th Cir. 1952)   Cited 13 times

    No. 4171. January 4, 1952. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Fannie M. Boyls, and Julius G. Serot, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Philip Hornbein, Jr., Denver, Colo. (Philip Hornbein, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for respondents. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a conventional proceeding in which the Board seeks enforcement of its order against Denver Building and Construction

  8. Martin v. Theockary

    220 F.2d 900 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 6 times

    No. 14999. March 30, 1955. H. Reid DeJarnette, Dixon, DeJarnette Bradford, and Douglas M. Carlton, Miami, Fla., for appellant. Melvin W. Nelson, Miami, Fla., Philip Gensler, New Orleans, La., for appellee. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and TUTTLE, Circuit Judges. TUTTLE, Circuit Judge. The sole question on this appeal is whether under Florida law, an employee who is injured through the negligence of a co-employee, such injury being compensable under the workmen's compensation law, may