§

Dallas General Drivers

118 N.L.R.B. 1251 (N.L.R.B. 1957)
Dallas General Drivers

14 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. Hughes v. Superior Court

    339 U.S. 460 (1950)   Cited 285 times
    In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.

  4. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  5. Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.

    341 U.S. 665 (1951)   Cited 126 times
    Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"

  6. Hoke & Economides v. United States

    227 U.S. 308 (1913)   Cited 221 times
    Holding that it is interstate commerce to transport a woman from one state to another in a common carrier

  7. National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Gen. Drivers, Etc

    225 F.2d 205 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 43 times

    No. 15305. August 2, 1955. Miss Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., N.L.R.B., Silver Springs, Md., Owsley Vose, Asso. Ch. Enf. Br., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Cnsl., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Samuel M. Singer, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Chris Dixie, Houston, Tex., Mullinax Wells, Dallas, Tex., Dixie, Ryan Schulman, Houston, Tex., for respondents. Before RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DAWKINS and DE VANE, District Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Assoc. Musicians

    226 F.2d 900 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 39 times

    No. 35, Docket 23550. Argued October 5, 1955. Decided November 3, 1955. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. David I. Ashe, New York City (Ashe Rifkin, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges. CLARK,

  9. Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Ect.

    75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948)   Cited 51 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.

  10. Printing Specialties & Paper Converters Union v. Le Baron

    171 F.2d 331 (9th Cir. 1949)   Cited 36 times

    No. 11894. December 13, 1948. Rehearing Denied January 19, 1949. Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Paul J. McCormick, Judge. Proceeding by Howard F. Le Baron, Regional Director of the Twenty-First Region of the National Labor Relations Board, on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, against Printing Specialties and Paper Converters Union, Local 388, A.F.L., and another, to enjoin alleged unfair labor practices in violation