§

Dallas Concrete Co.

102 N.L.R.B. 1292 (N.L.R.B. 1953)
Dallas Concrete Co.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  3. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  4. Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.

    337 U.S. 656 (1949)   Cited 88 times
    Holding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"

  5. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    118 F.2d 874 (1st Cir. 1941)   Cited 39 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Reed Prince Mfg. Co., 1 Cir., 118 F.2d 874, certiorari denied 313 U.S. 595, 61 S.Ct. 1119, 85 L.Ed. 1549, it was held that an employer's insistence on a provision in a contract with a bargaining agent, that during the period of the contract or at any future time the employees and the union would not request or demand a closed shop agreement or check-off system, warranted the National Labor Relations Board in inferring that the employer was not actuated by a genuine desire to reach an accord with the bargaining representative.

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Harris-Woodson Co.

    162 F.2d 97 (4th Cir. 1947)   Cited 18 times

    No. 5585. May 31, 1947. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce a cease and desist order against Harris-Woodson Company., Inc. Order enforced. Sidney J. Barban, of Baltimore, Md. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Morris P. Glushien, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Bernard Dunau, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Karl M. Dollak, of Washington, D.C., (William F. Howe and Gall Lane, all of Washington

  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Crown Can Co.

    138 F.2d 263 (8th Cir. 1943)   Cited 19 times

    No. 12547. October 25, 1943. Rehearing Denied November 9, 1943. On Petition for the Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its order directed to the Crown Can Company at its Nebraska City, Nebraska, plant. Order enforced. Russell Packard, Atty. for National Labor Relations Board, of Chicago, Ill. (Robert B. Watts, General Counsel; Ernest A. Gross, Associate General Counsel; Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. General

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Franks Bros. Co.

    137 F.2d 989 (1st Cir. 1943)   Cited 19 times

    No. 3872. July 27, 1943. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against the Franks Brothers Company for enforcement of the board's order directing respondent to bargain collectively with the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, CIO, as the exclusive representative of respondent's employees, and refrain from interfering with, restraining or coercing such employees. Decree enforcing the order. Malcolm A. Hoffmann

  10. D.H. Holmes Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    179 F.2d 876 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 11 times

    No. 12745. February 18, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 28, 1950. Leon Sarpy, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. Andrew P. Carter, Attorney, New Orleans, La., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and McCORD, Circuit Judges. McCORD, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by D.H. Holmes Company, Ltd., a Louisiana Corporation, to review and set aside an order