§

Dale Mackelprang, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Pacific/Western Region), Agency.

01982356 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 15, 1999)
Dale Mackelprang, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Pacific/Western Region), Agency.

3 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. Postal Service Bd. of Govs. v. Aikens

    460 U.S. 711 (1983)   Cited 2,406 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because "[t]here will seldom be `eyewitness' testimony to the employer's mental process," evidence of the employer's discriminatory attitude in general is relevant and admissible to prove discrimination

  2. Cuddy v. Carmen

    762 F.2d 119 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 55 times

    No. 84-5132. Argued February 26, 1985. Decided May 21, 1985. William H. Cuddy, pro se. Diane M. Sullivan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., and Royce C. Lamberth, R. Craig Lawrence, and Michael J. Ryan, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.C.Civil Action No. 79-1249). Before ROBINSON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT and WALD, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the

  3. Section 621 - Congressional statement of findings and purpose

    29 U.S.C. § 621   Cited 17,503 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "older workers find themselves disadvantaged in their efforts to retain employment, and especially to regain employment when displaced from jobs"