§

DaimlerChrysler Corp.

344 N.L.R.B. 1324 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
DaimlerChrysler Corp.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  5. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

  6. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    288 F.3d 434 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 12 times
    Noting that relevant information requests are presumed to have been made in good faith "until the company demonstrates otherwise"

  7. Eastern Omni Constr. Inc. v. National Labor

    170 F.3d 418 (4th Cir. 1999)   Cited 2 times
    Finding valid safety concerns justified the ban on union decals on hardhats

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Almet, Inc.

    987 F.2d 445 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that threatening to discipline employees for not reporting union solicitation violated § 8

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Blades Manufacturing Corporation

    344 F.2d 998 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 25 times
    In Blades the court nullified a second election (choosing the union) within a year of a valid election rejecting the union.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Cleveland Pneumatic Co.

    777 F.2d 339 (6th Cir. 1985)

    No. 84-5810. Argued October 8, 1985. Decided November 26, 1985. Elliott Moore, Mark S. McCarty, (LEAD) argued, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Keith Ashmus, argued, Thompson, Hine Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent. Before MARTIN and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order finding respondent Cleveland Pneumatic Company in violation of section 8(a)(1) of the