§

Daimler Chrysler

331 N.L.R.B. 1324 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Daimler Chrysler

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. A-Plus Roofing, Inc.

    39 F.3d 1410 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that a magistrate judge did not have authority under § 636(b) to conduct criminal contempt trial without consent of defendant

  3. Providence Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    93 F.3d 1012 (1st Cir. 1996)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that where, inter alia, the employer distributed written information about a merger, including some workplace changes such as "broad hints that it already had formulated some ideas relative to future staffing of the new system" and its expected regulatory approval, "[u]nder the totality of the circumstances that existed here—especially the employer's expressed confidence that the merger would take place soon and the emphasis in its handouts on the reallocation of personnel," substantial evidence supported the Board's order requiring disclosure of merger-related documents

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Pfizer, Inc.

    763 F.2d 887 (7th Cir. 1985)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that an employer's bare assertion that information is confidential does not entitle it to resist production

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Rockwell-Standard, Trans. Axle

    410 F.2d 953 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 44 times

    No. 18651. May 29, 1969. Leonard M. Wagman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Neal J. Conway, Atty., Washington, D.C., on brief. Leonard L. Scheinholtz, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent, Jonathan L. Alder, Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., on brief. Before PHILLIPS, EDWARDS and PECK, Circuit Judges. Judge Edwards took no part in the consideration of decision of this case

  6. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service

    888 F.2d 1568 (11th Cir. 1989)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that an employer violates the NLRA when it fails “to provide information that is needed by the bargaining representative for the proper performance of its duties”

  7. Local 13, Detroit Newspaper, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    598 F.2d 267 (D.C. Cir. 1979)   Cited 24 times
    Clarifying that the good-faith requirement applies both to employer and union