§
Daikichi Sushi

12 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. District Council of Iron Workers of California & Vicinity

    124 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 48 times

    No. 95-70772 Argued November 8, 1996 — San Francisco, California. Submission deferred November, 8, 1996 Submitted November 20, 1996 The panel finds this case appropriate for submission on the briefs without oral argument pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and 9th Cir. R. 34-4. Decided September 4, 1997 COUNSEL Margaret Gaines Neigus, Deborah E. Shrager, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Victor J. Van Bourg, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger Rosenfeld, Oakland, Ca, for respondents

  4. W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues

  5. N.L.R.B. v. General Fabrications Corp.

    222 F.3d 218 (6th Cir. 2000)   Cited 25 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding the NLRB is entitled to summary enforcement of unchallenged portions of orders

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

    94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 178 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

  7. Torbitt Castleman v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    123 F.3d 899 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 17 times
    Stating that an employee's subjective reaction does not render the challenged conduct unlawful

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Adco Electric Inc.

    6 F.3d 1110 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that employee "recommend[ing] someone for hire and [bringing] problems with apprentice employees to the attention of [his superior] is nothing more than what [the employer] would expect from experienced employees"

  9. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Drywall

    974 F.2d 1000 (8th Cir. 1992)   Cited 10 times
    Holding employer's "failure to ever comply with any of the terms of the contract and his continuing failure to pay into the Union's fringe benefit funds constituted a total repudiation of the contract"