§

Dahl Fish Co.; Sea-Pac, Inc.; Blaine Protein, Inc.; B.P.I. International Sales, Inc.

299 N.L.R.B. 413 (N.L.R.B. 1990)
Dahl Fish Co.; Sea-Pac, Inc.; Blaine Protein, Inc.; B.P.I. International Sales, Inc.

18 Cited authorities

  1. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 978 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  2. Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

    380 U.S. 255 (1965)   Cited 326 times
    Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. South Prairie Constr. v. Operating Engineers

    425 U.S. 800 (1976)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that appeals court usurped role of NLRB by reversing Board's legal conclusion and proceeding to decide issue of fact that should be decided by Board in the first instance

  4. Labor Board v. Deena Artware

    361 U.S. 398 (1960)   Cited 139 times
    Ruling that derivative liability could be imposed on the basis of single employer status

  5. Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B

    315 U.S. 100 (1942)   Cited 187 times
    Ruling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order

  6. Sea-Pac Co. v. United Food Workers

    103 Wn. 2d 800 (Wash. 1985)   Cited 109 times
    Holding that unfair labor practice charges could not form basis of action for abuse of process because no process was issued by Washington courts and that whether union misused process of National Labor Relations Board was for board to decide

  7. State v. Ralph Williams

    87 Wn. 2d 298 (Wash. 1976)   Cited 113 times
    Holding a responsible corporate officer liable for deceptive trade practices of a car dealership where the officer formulated and supervised the dealership's unlawful activities

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Don Burgess Const. Corp.

    596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 101 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"

  9. Grayson v. Nordic Constr. Co.

    92 Wn. 2d 548 (Wash. 1979)   Cited 91 times
    Finding if corporate officer participates in violation of Consumer Protection Act, officer is liable for penalties

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Emsing's Supermarket, Inc.

    872 F.2d 1279 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 32 times
    Granting enforcement of an NLRB order to an employer to cease and desist from unfair labor practices, including failing to make certain contractual payments after a CBA's expiration, and noting that "[a]n employer may not make changes in the terms and conditions of employment reflected in an expired [CBA; i]nstead, the employer must maintain the status quo after the expiration of a [CBA] until a new agreement is reached or until the parties bargain in good faith to impasse"