§

D & W Food Centers

305 N.L.R.B. 553 (N.L.R.B. 1991)
D & W Food Centers

7 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,732 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."

  4. J.P. Stevens Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    638 F.2d 676 (4th Cir. 1980)   Cited 15 times
    Recognizing significance of employer's history of § 8 violations

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Colony Printing and Labeling

    651 F.2d 502 (7th Cir. 1981)   Cited 2 times

    No. 80-2211. Argued April 13, 1981. Decided June 15, 1981. Jonathan Saperstein, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Thomas O. Magan, Evansville, Ind., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SWYGERT and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, Senior District Judge. The Honorable William J. Jameson, United States Senior District Judge for the District of Montana, is sitting by designation. SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Furnas Electric Company

    463 F.2d 665 (7th Cir. 1972)   Cited 6 times
    Deferring to a Board trial examiner's decision to accord limited probative weight to testimony that "resulted from the propounding of leading questions requiring little more than a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer"

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 25 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease