§

Custom Leather Designers

314 N.L.R.B. 413 (N.L.R.B. 1994)
Custom Leather Designers

8 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO

    417 U.S. 249 (1974)   Cited 366 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees

  3. Nathanson v. Labor Board

    344 U.S. 25 (1952)   Cited 279 times
    Holding that "if one claimant is to be preferred over others, the purpose should be clear from the statute"

  4. Carpenters Local U #1846 v. Pratt-Farnsworth

    690 F.2d 489 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 184 times
    Holding that a § 301 claim for breach of contract may be stated under an alter ego theory where the defendant had not signed the CBA

  5. Thompson v. Texas Mexican R. Co.

    328 U.S. 134 (1946)   Cited 172 times
    Holding that the ICC had primary jurisdiction to interpret a trackage rights agreement because "[i]t is the function of the Commission to determine the terms and conditions under which trackage rights are acquired"

  6. Smith v. Hoboken R. Co.

    328 U.S. 123 (1946)   Cited 89 times
    In Smith v. Hoboken R.R. Warehouse S.S. Connecting Co., 328 U.S. 123, 133, 66 S.Ct. 947, 953, 90 L.Ed. 1123 (1946), the Supreme Court declined to enforce an ipso facto clause that terminated a ground lease upon which the insolvent railroad's tracks were laid. Without the lease, the railroad would have forfeited its business and been unable to reorganize.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Evans Plumbing Co.

    639 F.2d 291 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that an enforcement proceeding by the NLRB falls within the police-power exception

  8. Section 362 - Automatic stay

    11 U.S.C. § 362   Cited 29,934 times   179 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that cause exists to lift the stay because no bankruptcy purpose would be served by keeping the stay in place