§

Curtis Mathes Manufacturing Co.

145 N.L.R.B. 473 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Curtis Mathes Manufacturing Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  2. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  3. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  4. Howell Chev. Co. v. Labor Board

    346 U.S. 482 (1953)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that a car retailer is subject to Commerce Clause as an "'integral part' of General Motors' national system of distribution."

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co.

    204 F.2d 79 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 53 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 86 (9th Cir. 1953), we recognized that "carriage, behavior, bearing, manner and appearance of a witness, — his demeanor, —" may cause the trier of fact to reject uncontradicted testimony.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. S. Bleachery

    257 F.2d 235 (4th Cir. 1958)   Cited 33 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the essential inquiry is whether the employer shares the power of management

  7. Time-O-Matic, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    264 F.2d 96 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 32 times

    No. 12424. March 5, 1959. Edward B. Miller, Merrill Shepard, Willis S. Ryza, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner, Time-O-Matic, Inc. Pope Ballard, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fred S. Landess, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge and HASTINGS and PARKINSON, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Knight Morley Corp.

    251 F.2d 753 (6th Cir. 1958)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that § 502's purpose was to give employees a right to walk off the job because of abnormally dangerous conditions "even in the face of a no-strike clause in their contract with an employer"

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Saxe-Glassman Shoe

    201 F.2d 238 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 17 times

    No. 4658. January 12, 1953. Rehearing Denied February 17, 1953. Sidney A. Coven, Boston, Mass. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Elizabeth W. Weston and Nancy M. Sherman, of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Maurice Epstein, Boston, Mass. (Benjamin E. Gordon and Gordon Epstein, Boston, Mass., on the brief), for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges

  10. N.C. Finishing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.2d 714 (4th Cir. 1943)   Cited 10 times

    No. 5005. February 17, 1943. On petition to Review and Set Aside and on Request for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the North Carolina Finishing Company to review a cease and desist order issued against it by the National Labor Relations Board which order further directed the reinstatement with back pay of a discharged employee. Order of the board affirmed and judgment to be entered enforcing the order. Before PARKER, SOPER, and DOBIE, Circuit Judges. Walter