Curlin Medical Inc.
4 Cited authorities
In re Etablissements Darty Et Fils
759 F.2d 15 (Fed. Cir. 1985) Cited 8 timesIn Darty et Fils, however, even though, the primary question was whether "Darty" was primarily merely a surname, the Board had correctly held that the Opposers’ "provides no support for their contention."
Kimberly Clark Corp. v. Marzall
94 F. Supp. 254 (D.D.C. 1950) Cited 1 timesCiv. Nos. 1897, 5175. December 8, 1950. Cushman, Darby Cushman, Washington, D.C., C. Willard Hayes, Max Louis, Washington, D.C., Cyril A. Soans, William E. Anderson, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for plaintiff. E.L. Reynolds, Sol., Washington, D.C., for defendant. KIRKLAND, District Judge. This case is a consolidation of two separate causes of action filed by the plaintiff, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, to authorize the Commissioner of Patents to register plaintiff's
Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification
15 U.S.C. § 1051 Cited 3,914 times 126 Legal AnalysesRequiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark
Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration
15 U.S.C. § 1052 Cited 1,610 times 274 Legal AnalysesGranting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"