ยง

Curlee Clothing Company

240 N.L.R.B. 355 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Curlee Clothing Company

16 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Litteral v. Indem. Ins. of N.A.

    370 U.S. 919 (1962)   Cited 62 times

    No. 949. June 11, 1962. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. C. E. Tate and John Alan Appleman for petitioners. Horace E. Gunn for respondent. Reported below: 300 F. 2d 340.

  3. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B

    354 F.2d 432 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 54 times
    In James H. Matthews Co., supra, the employee in question signed an authorization card. Later the union received a letter, postmarked 11 days after the effective date for determining majority status of the union, requesting return of the employee's authorization card. Allegedly, the letter was neither written, dated, nor addressed by the employee and was originally left with an undisclosed person.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation

    351 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Cumberland we emphasized that "In no instance did any employee testify that he was told that the election was the only purpose of the card."

  5. Irving Air Chute Company v. N.L.R.B

    350 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times
    In Irving Air Chute Co. v. N.L.R.B., 2 Cir., 350 F.2d 176, 182, the Court in allowing enforcement of the Board's order cited many cases for the proposition, "`It is for the Board not the courts to determine how the effect of prior unfair labor practices may be expunged'."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.

    554 F.2d 996 (10th Cir. 1977)   Cited 24 times
    Permitting inference

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Drives, Incorporated

    440 F.2d 354 (7th Cir. 1971)   Cited 30 times
    In NLRB v. Drives, Inc., 440 F.2d 354, 364 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 912, 92 S.Ct. 229, 30 L.Ed.2d 185 (1971), the court upheld the Board's ruling that an employer had violated ยง 8(a)(1) when he distributed a survey shortly before a representation election requesting employees to make specific suggestions for improvements in working conditions and implying that the improvements would come only if the union were defeated.

  8. International Un., United A., A. v. N.L.R.B

    363 F.2d 702 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 34 times
    Rejecting argument NLRB used section 8(c) protected statements as "as some evidence of the unfair labor practices themselves" and concluding statements were used only to "place . . . other acts in context"

  9. United Steelworkers of America v. N.L.R.B

    376 F.2d 770 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 27 times

    Nos. 18921, 20211. Argued November 22, 1966. Decided March 24, 1967. Petitions for Rehearing Denied April 21, 1967. Mr. Michael Gottesman, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Elliott Bredhoff, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 18,921 and intervenor in No. 20,211. Mrs. Janet Kohn, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Patent Trader, Inc.

    426 F.2d 791 (2d Cir. 1970)   Cited 22 times
    In NLRB v. Patent Trader, Inc., 426 F.2d 791 (2d Cir. 1970) (in banc), there was both passage of time and "repudiation" of the union by a majority of the employees.