Cumberland Shoe Corp.

9 Cited authorities

Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 731 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Interstate Circuit v. U.S.
306 U.S. 208 (1939) Cited 512 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"
N.L.R.B. v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation
351 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1965) Cited 49 times 2 Legal Analyses
In Cumberland we emphasized that "In no instance did any employee testify that he was told that the election was the only purpose of the card."
N.L.R.B. v. Brown-Dunkin Company
287 F.2d 17 (10th Cir. 1961) Cited 28 times
No. 6402. January 19, 1961. Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Karl H. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex. (Harold E. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Chief Judge. This petition is to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board finding the respondent, a large department store
Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B
316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963) Cited 22 times
In Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963), this Court held that a company which contracted out work in part to rid itself of a union violated the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 158 et seq.
East Bay Un. of Machinists v. N.L.R.B
322 F.2d 411 (D.C. Cir. 1963) Cited 19 times
Nos. 17275, 17468. Argued April 29, 1963. Decided July 3, 1963. Petitions for Rehearing Before the Division Denied September 27, 1963. Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied September 27, 1963. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff, and Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17275 and intervenors in No. 17468. Mr. Marion B. Plant, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Mr. Gerard D. Reilly, Washington, D.C., was
West Penn Power Company v. N.L.R.B
337 F.2d 993 (3d Cir. 1964) Cited 12 times
Involving power transmission and distribution supervisors that prioritized repairs and de-energized lines for repair
Darlington Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B
325 F.2d 682 (4th Cir. 1963) Cited 10 times
Nos. 8790, 8861, 8906. Argued June 13, 1963. Decided November 15, 1963. Thornton H. Brooks, Greensboro, N.C. (McLendon, Brim, Holderness Brooks, Greensboro, N.C., on the brief) for Darlington Manufacturing Co. Stuart N. Updike and John R. Schoemer, Jr., New York City (Townley, Updike, Carter Rodgers, New York City, on the brief) for Deering Milliken, Inc., and Deering, Milliken and Company, Inc. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel; (Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel;
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Cumberland Shoe Corp.

9 Cited authorities

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

In Cumberland we emphasized that "In no instance did any employee testify that he was told that the election was the only purpose of the card."

In Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963), this Court held that a company which contracted out work in part to rid itself of a union violated the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 158 et seq.

Involving power transmission and distribution supervisors that prioritized repairs and de-energized lines for repair

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"