§

Cruse Motors, Inc.

105 N.L.R.B. 242 (N.L.R.B. 1953)
Cruse Motors, Inc.

16 Cited authorities

  1. Communications Assn. v. Douds

    339 U.S. 382 (1950)   Cited 654 times
    Holding that speech-contingent withdrawal of opportunity to invoke the facilities of the National Labor Relations Board improperly abridged speech

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dant

    344 U.S. 375 (1953)   Cited 24 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Dant, 344 U.S. 375, 73 S.Ct. 375, 97 L.Ed. 407, the legal effect of affidavits filed by union officers was successfully challenged in an enforcement proceeding in the Court of Appeals.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whittier Mills Co.

    111 F.2d 474 (5th Cir. 1940)   Cited 67 times
    Interpreting Virginian Railway's holding as “[w]here with fair opportunity to all members of the unit to vote, a majority do vote, they are, so to speak, a quorum to settle the matter, and the majority of that quorum binds those not voting, and suffices to select the bargaining representative of the unit”

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Colten

    105 F.2d 179 (6th Cir. 1939)   Cited 62 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Colten, 6 Cir., 105 F.2d 179, 183, it was said that "* * * the strife which is sought to be averted is no less an object of legislative solicitude when contract, death, or operation of law brings about change of ownership in the employing agency."

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Armato

    199 F.2d 800 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 38 times

    No. 10691. November 19, 1952. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. O.S. Hoebreckx and Clark M. Robertson, Robertson Hoebreckx, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondents. Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. LINDLEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the provisions

  6. National Labor Bd. v. Sanson Hosiery Mills

    195 F.2d 350 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 34 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Sanson Hosiery Mills, 5 Cir., 195 F.2d 350, this court held that when the Board has duly certified a bargaining representative, such certification must be respected by the employer until set aside by the Board, even though the Union has meanwhile lost its majority support of the employees.

  7. Poole Foundry Mach. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    192 F.2d 740 (4th Cir. 1951)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Poole the court upheld the Board's bargaining order, concluding that the employer's withdrawal of recognition of the union based on a decertification petition signed by sixty-four of sixty-six employees within four months of the employer's settlement agreement with the union violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act.

  8. National L. Rel. Board v. Appalachian E. Power

    140 F.2d 217 (4th Cir. 1944)   Cited 29 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Appalachian Electric Power Co., 4 Cir., 140 F.2d 217, 224, the court, following the rule announced in the Third Circuit in National Labor Relations Board v. Botany Worsted Mills Co., supra, held that where a bargaining agent was selected by employees in an election supervised by the Board, they could not repudiate it within ten weeks thereafter, as such conduct would preclude the adequate protection of the very rights which the Act was designed to secure.

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Somerville Buick

    194 F.2d 56 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 13 times

    No. 4606. January 28, 1952. Dominick L. Manoli, Attorney, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Roland E. Ginsburg, Attorney, all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Julius Kirle, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before CLARK, WOODBURY, and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bill Daniels, Inc.

    202 F.2d 579 (6th Cir. 1953)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 11536, 11582. January 20, 1953. Rehearing Denied March 17, 1953. John E. Jay, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers and Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Frank E. Kenney, Detroit, Mich., for respondents. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges. ALLEN, Circuit Judge. The question presented in these cases arising out of petitions for enforcement of orders of the National Labor Relations Board is whether