4 Cited authorities
Farmers Irrigation Co. v. McComb
337 U.S. 755 (1949) Cited 145 times 2 Legal AnalysesIn Farmers Reservoir, for example, the Supreme Court concluded that "the physical operation, control and maintenance" of "canals, reservoirs, and headgates" for a company that stored water and distributed it to farms through the company's canals were activities "[c]learly... not done on a farm."
Bowie v. Gonzalez
117 F.2d 11 (1st Cir. 1941) Cited 96 timesIn Bowie v. Gonzalez, 1 Cir., 117 F.2d 11, 20, the Circuit Court of Appeals held "dead" season employees who were "engaged in the repair and maintenance of the milling and transportation facilities" of a company engaged in gathering and refining sugar cane, were covered by the Act.
Calaf v. Gonzalez
127 F.2d 934 (1st Cir. 1942) Cited 35 timesNo. 3748. May 8, 1942. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for Puerto Rico; Cooper, Judge. Action by Justo Gonzalez, Jr., and others against Jaime Calaf Collazo and others to recover wages and liquidated damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, §§ 6, 16, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 206, 216. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Affirmed. Nelson Gammans, of New York City (R. Rivera Zayas, Joaquin Velilla, and Orlando J. Antonsanti, all of San Juan, P.R., on the brief),
Walling v. Peacock Corporation
58 F. Supp. 880 (E.D. Wis. 1943) Cited 10 timesCivil Action No. 689. July 23, 1943. Victor M. Harding, Jr., of Department of Labor, of Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff. Kadwit Lepp, of Kenosha, Wis., for defendant. Action by L. Metcalfe Walling, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, against the Peacock Corporation to enjoin defendant from violating the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Injunction issued. DUFFY, District Judge. Plaintiff seeks an injunction to restrain