Crowley's Milk Co., Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
  2. Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.

    306 U.S. 240 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Serv. Trade C

    191 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 44 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, etc., supra, it was said: "We take this to mean that a union may lawfully inflict harm on a neutral employer, without violating ยง 8 (b) (4), so long as the harm is merely incidental to a traditionally lawful primary strike, conducted at the place where the primary employer does business."
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Greensboro Coca Cola Bottling Co.

    180 F.2d 840 (4th Cir. 1950)   Cited 35 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Greensboro Coca Cola Bottling Co., 4 Cir., 180 F.2d 840, 844, similar contentions were considered and determined.
  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Stocker Mfg. Co.

    185 F.2d 451 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that an agency is permitted to make its findings and predicate its orders upon the written record without hearing the witnesses testify
  6. Hoover Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    191 F.2d 380 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 18 times

    No. 11223. July 9, 1951. Donald K. Merwin, Richard G. McCuskey, Canton, Ohio (Donald K. Merwin, Richard G. McCuskey, Canton, Ohio, on the brief, Black, McCuskey, Souers Arbaugh, Canton, Ohio, of counsel), for petitioner. Herschel Kriger, Canton, Ohio (Herschel Kriger, Canton, Ohio, on the brief), for charging parties amicus curiae. Isadore J. Gromfine, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David Findling, A Norman Somers, Owsley Vose, and Arnold Ordman, all of Washington, D.C. on the brief), for respondent

  7. Law v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    192 F.2d 236 (10th Cir. 1951)   Cited 10 times

    No. 4224. October 25, 1951. R.C. Garland, Las Cruces, N.M. (Garland Sanders, Las Cruces, N.M., on the brief), for petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Arnold Ordman, Atty., NLRB, all of Washington, D.C., and Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., NLRB, Takoma Park, Md., on the brief), for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit