§
Crow Gravel Co.

12 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Silk

    331 U.S. 704 (1947)   Cited 542 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that truck drivers who owned their own trucks and hired their own helpers were "small businessmen" who were properly classified as independent contractors

  2. United States v. Chemical Foundation

    272 U.S. 1 (1926)   Cited 876 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that enemy-property custodian "was a mere conservator and was authorized to sell only to prevent waste"

  3. Labor Board v. Reliance Fuel Corp.

    371 U.S. 224 (1963)   Cited 133 times
    In Reliance Fuel Oil Corp., the Board found that Reliance Fuel Oil Corp. ("Reliance"), a New York corporation engaged in the business of selling fuel oil for heating purposes and servicing oil burners and boilers, was engaged in commerce within the meaning of the NLRA because it had "purchased a substantial amount of fuel oil from Gulf, a company concededly engaged in interstate commerce."

  4. Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    365 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 63 times

    Nos. 19452, 19515. Argued January 10, 1966. Decided June 27, 1966. Mr. Joel Field, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19452. Mr. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19515

  5. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  6. United Brick Clay Workers v. Deena Artware

    198 F.2d 637 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 49 times
    In Deena Artware, "Whoever shall be injured" was applicable to the primary employer upon which the union attempted to force their acceptance as representatives of the primary employer's employees.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Greensboro Coca Cola Bottling Co.

    180 F.2d 840 (4th Cir. 1950)   Cited 35 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Greensboro Coca Cola Bottling Co., 4 Cir., 180 F.2d 840, 844, similar contentions were considered and determined.

  8. National Labor Rel. v. Pac. Intermountain

    228 F.2d 170 (8th Cir. 1956)   Cited 24 times

    No. 15318. December 23, 1955. Rehearing Denied February 7, 1956. Rose Mary Filipowicz, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with her on the brief), for petitioner. Harry L. Browne, Kansas City, Mo. (Raymond F. Beagle, Jr., and Spencer, Fane, Britt Browne, Kansas City, Mo., were with him on the brief), for respondent Pac

  9. Hiladelphia Moving Picture Mach. v. N.L.R.B

    382 F.2d 598 (3d Cir. 1967)   Cited 7 times

    No. 16119. Argued May 2, 1967. Decided August 1, 1967. James J. Leyden, Philadelphia, Pa. (Herbert G. Keene, Jr., Schnader, Harrison, Segal Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Linda R. Sher, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and SEITZ, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT

  10. Pedersen v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    234 F.2d 417 (2d Cir. 1956)   Cited 15 times

    No. 273, Docket 23888. Argued March 14, 1956. Decided June 7, 1956. Emanuel Friedman, New York City (Sidney S. Grant, Grant Angoff, Boston, Mass., of counsel on the brief), for petitioner. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel; Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman and Rose Mary Filipowicz, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Myron P. Gordon, New York City, for intervenor. Before FRANK, LUMBARD and WATERMAN