§
Crimptex, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  3. Red Star Exp. Lines v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    196 F.2d 78 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 34 times
    In Red Star Express Lines v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 196 F.2d 78, the court condemned the contract although the so-called general savings clause provided that any specific provision which was even "affected" by Taft-Hartley was to be without effect.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Quincy Steel Cast

    200 F.2d 293 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 31 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Quincy Steel Casting Co., 1 Cir., 200 F.2d 293, another case relied upon by the Board, the factual situation obtaining there is entirely different from that of the instant case, inasmuch as the employee was a molder the greater portion of his working time and there was evidence in the record that any skilled molder was competent to handle the job and that other workers engaged with him testified that the operation was more or less routine.

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Kennametal, Inc.

    182 F.2d 817 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 26 times

    No. 10113. Argued May 5, 1950. May 24, 1950. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas McDermott, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. William B. Paul, Pittsburgh, Pa. (John C. Hill, Paul, Lawrence Wills, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before MARIS, GOODRICH and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. GOODRICH, Circuit Judge. This petition for enforcement of an order

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. May Dept. Stores Co.

    146 F.2d 66 (8th Cir. 1945)   Cited 19 times

    No. 12840. December 20, 1944. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing January 11, 1945. On Petition for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order requiring May Department Stores Company, doing business as Famous-Barr Company, to cease and desist from refusing to bargain collectively with a union as the exclusive representative of all the employees engaged in the busheling rooms. Order of the Board enforced. Eugene R. Thorrens

  7. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Buzza-Cardozo

    205 F.2d 889 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 8 times

    No. 13486. July 15, 1953. Rehearing Denied August 6, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Bernard Dunau and Abraham Siegel, Washington, D.C. (Fredrick Reel, Washington, D.C., argued), for petitioner. Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould, Los Angeles, Cal. (Ray L. Johnson, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., argued), for respondent. Before MATHEWS, HEALY, and BONE, Circuit Judges. HEALY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Smith Victory Corp.

    190 F.2d 56 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 3 times

    No. 250 Docket 21961. Argued May 3, 1951. Decided June 1, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman and John E. Jay, all of Washington, D.C., National Labor Relations Board. Saperston, McNaughton Saperston, Buffalo, N.Y., Howard T. Saperston, Buffalo, N.Y., for respondent. Before L. HAND, CHASE and FRANK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The only issue of any importance upon this motion to enforce the Board's order

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Rugcrofters of Puerto Rico, Inc.

    213 F.2d 537 (1st Cir. 1954)

    No. 4810. June 7, 1954. Ruth V. Reel, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Louis Schwartz, Atty., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Philip Licari, Santurce, Puerto Rico, for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order against respondent issued December 2, 1953. The