Crest Floors & Plastics, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
N.L.R.B. v. Don Burgess Const. Corp.
596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 101 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"
Hinson v. N.L.R.B
428 F.2d 133 (8th Cir. 1970) Cited 81 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"
N.L.R.B. v. Triumph Curing Ctr.
571 F.2d 462 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 31 times
Withholding of bargaining order not justified, notwithstanding "extremes of verbal abuse and serious threats of physical violence" during first month of protracted strike
Sakrete of Northern Calif., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
332 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1964) Cited 48 times
No. 18745. May 21, 1964. Rehearing Denied July 9, 1964. Graydon, Head Ritchey, William A. McKenzie, Leslie A. Meek, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Arnold Orman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison and Peter M. Giesey, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Leon Ardzrooni, Neyhart Grodin, San Francisco, Cal., on behalf of amicus curiae-Freight, Construction, General Drivers Helpers, Local 287. Before MADDEN
N.L.R.B. v. Tragniew, Inc.
470 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1972) Cited 26 times
In NLRB v. Tragniew, Inc., 470 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1972), this court held that evidence of an unfair labor practice that occurred beyond the 10(b) period could not be admitted in defense of a refusal to bargain charge.
Los Angeles Marine Hardware Co. v. N.L.R.B
602 F.2d 1302 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 18 times
No. 78-1907. May 2, 1979. Anthony T. Oliver, Jr. (argued), Parker, Milliken, Clark O'Hara, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners. Elliott Moore, Michael Nicholson (argued), N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. On Petition to Review a Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and TEMPLAR, Senior District Judge. Of the District of Kansas. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: Los Angeles Marine Hardware Co. (LA Marine) and California Marine
N.L.R.B. v. Lantz
607 F.2d 290 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 15 times
No. 78-2399. October 29, 1979. R. Michael Smith, NLRB, Washington, D.C., argued, for petitioner; Elliott Moore, NLRB, Washington, D.C., on brief. A. Stevenson Bogue, Nelson, Harding, Yeutter, Leonard Tate, Lincoln, Neb., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before HUFSTEDLER and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and GRANT, District Judge. Senior United States District Judge Robert A. Grant, Northern District of Indiana, sitting by designation.
Rayner v. N.L.R.B
665 F.2d 970 (9th Cir. 1982) Cited 12 times
In Rayner, the Board found the employer in violation of § 8(a)(1) and (5) and entered a remedial make-whole order that lasted beyond the end of the labor agreement.

Crest Floors & Plastics, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"

Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"

Withholding of bargaining order not justified, notwithstanding "extremes of verbal abuse and serious threats of physical violence" during first month of protracted strike

In NLRB v. Tragniew, Inc., 470 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1972), this court held that evidence of an unfair labor practice that occurred beyond the 10(b) period could not be admitted in defense of a refusal to bargain charge.

In Rayner, the Board found the employer in violation of § 8(a)(1) and (5) and entered a remedial make-whole order that lasted beyond the end of the labor agreement.