§

Cresent Auto Supply Co.

240 N.L.R.B. 826 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Cresent Auto Supply Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. J.P. Stevens Co. Inc., Gulistan

    538 F.2d 1152 (5th Cir. 1976)   Cited 39 times
    Holding Stevens in civil contempt for violating a court order that it bargain in good faith with its employees as required by the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. WKRG-TV, Inc.

    470 F.2d 1302 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 33 times
    Enforcing Gissel Order where employer interrogated employees, promised benefits if the union lost, prohibited solicitation, and otherwise interfered with unionization efforts

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Tragniew, Inc.

    470 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 26 times
    In NLRB v. Tragniew, Inc., 470 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1972), this court held that evidence of an unfair labor practice that occurred beyond the 10(b) period could not be admitted in defense of a refusal to bargain charge.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Louisiana Manufacturing Company

    374 F.2d 696 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 32 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Louisiana Manufacturing Company, 374 F.2d 696, 701-703 (8th Cir. 1967), this court was faced with the question of whether similar statements could be construed as being threats of economic reprisal.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. King Radio Corporation

    510 F.2d 1154 (10th Cir. 1975)   Cited 13 times

    No. 74-1421. Argued January 24, 1975. Decided February 12, 1975. Rehearing Denied March 24, 1975. Alan D. Longman, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and William H. DuRoss, III, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief) for petitioner. William G. Haynes, Topeka, Kan. (Eidson, Lewis, Porter Haynes, Topeka, Kan., on the brief) for respondent. Blake, Uhlig Funk, Kansas City, Kan

  6. Poole Foundry Mach. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    192 F.2d 740 (4th Cir. 1951)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Poole the court upheld the Board's bargaining order, concluding that the employer's withdrawal of recognition of the union based on a decertification petition signed by sixty-four of sixty-six employees within four months of the employer's settlement agreement with the union violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act.

  7. 7th Bap. Ch. v. Andrew Thomas

    81 A. 1 (Md. 1911)   Cited 5 times

    Decided June 22d 1911. Builder's contracts; variation; architect's certificate. Evidence; motion to strike out; non-reversible error. Bondsmen's liability. The ruling of the lower Court upon a motion to strike out evidence presents no reversible error when the action of the Court could in no way affect the conclusion reached by the Court of Appeals. p. 537 Where a building contract called for lime-mortar plaster, the contractor's bond is not liable for damages due to the use of a different kind of