§

Creative Vision Resources, LLC

364 NLRB No. 91 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
Creative Vision Resources, LLC

15 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Financial Institution Employees, Local 1182

    475 U.S. 192 (1986)   Cited 76 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that labor law prohibits the assignment or transfer of a collective bargaining agreement against the wishes of the workers for whom the agreement provides representation

  5. Dupont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C. v. N.L.R.B

    296 F.3d 495 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 27 times
    Defining "substantial evidence" under arbitrary-and-capricious review as "such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion"

  6. S F Market St. Healthcare LLC v. N.L.R.B

    570 F.3d 354 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 10 times

    No. 07-1439, 07-1502. Argued November 17, 2008. Decided June 30, 2009. John H. Douglas argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Ronald E. Meisburg, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Jill A. Griffin, Supervisory Attorney. Meredith L. Jason and Jason Walta, Attorneys, entered appearances. Before:

  7. Canteen Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    103 F.3d 1355 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 18 times
    Affirming NLRB's finding of substantial continuity where there was no temporal break in the operation of the two businesses

  8. Nazareth Regional High School v. N.L.R.B

    549 F.2d 873 (2d Cir. 1977)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that, to rebut a presumption of majority status, "the employer must produce clear and convincing evidence of loss of union support capable of raising a reasonable doubt of the union's continuing majority"

  9. May Dept. Stores Co. v. N.L.R.B

    897 F.2d 221 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 10 times
    Observing that the Board compares pre- and post-merger unions for continuity by looking to the "structure, administration, officers, assets, membership, autonomy, by-laws, size, and territorial jurisdiction, with an eye toward changes in the rights and obligations of the union's leadership and membership, and in the relationships between the putative bargaining agent, its affiliate, and the employer"

  10. Intern. Ass'n of Machinists, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    595 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 14 times
    Approving the Board's reasoning in Spruce Up

  11. Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    Fed. R. Evid. 201   Cited 29,609 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."

  12. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  13. Section 152 - Care and use of Smithsonian Library

    2 U.S.C. § 152

    The Smithsonian Institution shall have the use of the library referred to in section 151 of this title in like manner as before its removal. All the books, maps, and charts of the Smithsonian Library shall be properly cared for and preserved in like manner as are those of the Congressional Library; from which the Smithsonian Library shall not be removed except on reimbursement by the Smithsonian Institution to the Treasury of the United States of expenses incurred in binding and in taking care of