Craddock-Terry Shoe Corp.

Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B
176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949) Cited 64 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction
N.L.R.B. v. Movie Star, Inc.
361 F.2d 346 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 16 times
No. 21447. May 24, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Nancy Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, for petitioner. C. Dale Stout, New Orleans, La., Irving D. Lipkowitz, New York City, Robert Cohn, Atlanta, Ga., Lipkowitz, Plaut, Salberg Harris, New York City, Kullman Lang, New Orleans, La., for respondents Movie Star, Inc. and others. Before WHITAKER, Senior Judge, and WISDOM and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges. Of the
N.L.R.B. v. Yale Manufacturing Company
356 F.2d 69 (1st Cir. 1966) Cited 11 times
No. 6572. Heard January 3, 1966. Decided February 1, 1966. Bernard M. Dworski, Washington, D.C., Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Julius Kirle, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. McENTEE, Circuit Judge. In this proceeding the National Labor