CPL (Linwood) LLC d/b/a Linwood Care Center

14 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning
573 U.S. 513 (2014) Cited 274 times 150 Legal Analyses
Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.
381 U.S. 676 (1965) Cited 242 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding a marketing hours limitation contained in a multiemployer contract exempt from antitrust liability because its purpose was to protect the wages, hours, and working conditions of the union's members
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
321 U.S. 678 (1944) Cited 269 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8
Flying Food Group v. N.L.R.B
471 F.3d 178 (D.C. Cir. 2006) Cited 41 times
Holding that, in administrative proceedings, notice “is sufficient if the [petitioner] understood the issue and was afforded full opportunity to justify its conduct during the course of the litigation”
Poly-America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
260 F.3d 465 (5th Cir. 2001) Cited 20 times
Holding that strikers who protest unfair labor practices are entitled to unconditional reinstatement
Daily News of Los Angeles v. N.L.R.B
73 F.3d 406 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 15 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that merit-increase program is a mandatory subject of bargaining
Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990) Cited 20 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

CPL (Linwood) LLC d/b/a Linwood Care Center

14 Cited authorities

Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Finding a marketing hours limitation contained in a multiemployer contract exempt from antitrust liability because its purpose was to protect the wages, hours, and working conditions of the union's members

Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

Holding that, in administrative proceedings, notice “is sufficient if the [petitioner] understood the issue and was afforded full opportunity to justify its conduct during the course of the litigation”

Holding that strikers who protest unfair labor practices are entitled to unconditional reinstatement

Holding that merit-increase program is a mandatory subject of bargaining

Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"