§

CP Anchorage Hotel 2, LLC d/b/a Hilton Anchorage

369 N.L.R.B. 92 (N.L.R.B. 2020)
CP Anchorage Hotel 2, LLC d/b/a Hilton Anchorage

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  5. Int'l Union v. N.L.R.B

    514 F.3d 574 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 6 times

    No. 06-2156. Submitted: September 14, 2007. Decided and Filed: January 28, 2008. ON BRIEF: Bruce A. Miller, Robert P. Fetter, Miller Cohen, Detroit, Michigan, for Petitioners. Aileen A. Armstrong, Robert J. Englehart, Gregory P. Lauro, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Sean F. Crotty, Honigman, Miller, Schwartz Cohn, Detroit, Michigan, for Intervenor. Before: NORRIS, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges. GIBBONS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which NORRIS

  6. DTR Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    297 F. App'x 487 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 5 times
    In DTR Indus., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 297 Fed.Appx. 487, 493 (6th Cir.2008) (hereinafter “DTR II”), the Sixth Circuit compared statements made by the company that it had previously held did fall under the protection of § 158(c) with statements that did not qualify for the protection.

  7. Roadmaster Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    874 F.2d 448 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 24 times
    In Roadmaster Corp. v. NLRB, 874 F.2d 448, 451-54 (7th Cir.1989), the Seventh Circuit held that a union official who signed an employee's name to a grievance without the employee's permission was entitled to the protection of the NLRA. More recently, in OPW Fueling Components v. NLRB, 443 F.3d 490, 493-97 (6th Cir.2006), the Sixth Circuit held that a union official who signed the names of two involuntarily transferred employees to a grievance without their permission was entitled to the protection of the NLRA.

  8. OPW Fueling Components v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    443 F.3d 490 (6th Cir. 2006)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 04-2563, 05-1083. Argued: November 28, 2005. Decided and Filed: April 6, 2006. Petition for Rehearing Denied En Banc, July 28, 2006. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: Michael W. Hawkins, Dinsmore Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Petitioner. Heather S. Beard, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Michael W. Hawkins, Colleen P. Lewis, Dinsmore Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Petitioner. Heather S. Beard, Aileen A. Armstrong, Jill A. Griffin

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Federal Security, Inc.

    154 F.3d 751 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that discretionary jurisdiction may be waived

  10. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Atlanta Nat. Bank

    924 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir. 1990)   Cited 8 times
    Analyzing whether employer's threat to sue employee for defamation violated NLRA