§

Cowles Magazines and Broadcasting, Inc.

150 N.L.R.B. 602 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Cowles Magazines and Broadcasting, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  2. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 512 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  3. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Virginia Engineering Co.

    213 F.2d 109 (4th Cir. 1954)   Cited 31 times

    No. 6750. Argued April 14, 1954. Decided May 25, 1954. W.F. Hazen, Richmond, Va., and William E. Allaun, Jr., Newport News, Va. (Blake, Taylor and Hazen, Richmond, Va., and Newman, Allaun Downing, Newport News, Va., on the brief), for appellant. E. Sclater Montague, Hampton, Va. (Montague, Ferguson, Holt Cumming, Hampton, Va., and Canada, Russell, Turner Alexander, Memphis, Tenn., on the brief), for appellee. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, DOBIE, Circuit Judge, and HAYES, District Judge. PARKER, Chief

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick

    198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.

  6. Wonder State Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    331 F.2d 737 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 13 times

    No. 15390. April 2, 1964. V. Lee McMahon, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. McMahon Zempel, St. Louis, Mo., of counsel. Jules H. Gordon, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before PHILLIPS and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge. PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. This case is before the Court upon the petition

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Williams

    195 F.2d 669 (4th Cir. 1952)   Cited 23 times

    No. 6370. Argued March 6, 1952. Decided April 1, 1952. Arnold Ordman, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., and Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Takoma Park, Md., on the brief), for petitioner. Isadore S. Bernstein, Columbia, S.C. (Randolph Murdaugh, Hampton, S.C., and Henry H. Edens, Columbia

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dant

    207 F.2d 165 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 9 times

    No. 12985. September 15, 1953. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Asst. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, Morris A. Solomon, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Raymond S. Smathurst, Washington, D.C., J.P. Stirling, Roscoe Watts, John T. Casey, Portland, Or., for appellee. Before HEALY, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the Board, requests enforcement

  9. E. Anthony Sons v. National Labor Rel. Board

    163 F.2d 22 (D.C. Cir. 1947)   Cited 10 times

    No. 9385. Argued March 11, 1947. Decided June 23, 1947. Writ of Certiorari Denied October 13, 1947. See 68 S.Ct. 89. On Petition for Review and on Cross-Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by E. Anthony Sons, Inc., against the National Labor Relations Board to review and set aside an order of the Board wherein the Board sought a decree enforcing the Board's order. Petition to set aside order of Board denied and petition of Board granted. Mr. Elisha

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys