§

County Waste of Ulster

353 N.L.R.B. 842 (N.L.R.B. 2009)
County Waste of Ulster

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Davis Supermarkets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    2 F.3d 1162 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming bargaining order where company's "large number of unfair labor practices, . . . committed by some of the top officials in the company, and . . . directed at numerous employees . . . instilled a strong fear of union representation in the employees."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Windsor Castle Health Care Facilities, Inc.

    13 F.3d 619 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 14 times

    No. 539, Docket 93-4130. Argued November 8, 1993. Decided January 11, 1994. William A. Baudler, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC (Paul J. Spielberg, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Yvonne T. Dixon, Acting Deputy Gen. Counsel, Nicholas E. Karantinos, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John Truesdale, Peter B. Hoffman, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, of counsel) for petitioner. John M. Creane, Milford, CT, for Intervenor. Morris Tuchman, New

  5. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Coca-Cola Btlg. Co.

    132 F.3d 1001 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 6 times

    No. 97-1425. Argued: October 1, 1997. Decided: December 29, 1997. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (9-CA-34465). Joan Elizabeth Hoyte, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Michael Wade Bishop, EDWARDS, BALLARD, BISHOP, STURM, CLARK KEIM, P.A., Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Respondent. Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel,