County Concrete Corporation

7 Cited authorities

Communications Workers of America v. Beck
487 U.S. 735 (1988) Cited 277 times 44 Legal Analyses
Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
460 U.S. 693 (1983) Cited 311 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
Labor Board v. General Motors
373 U.S. 734 (1963) Cited 190 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause
H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 514 (1941) Cited 241 times 1 Legal Analyses
In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
United Paperworkers Int'l. Union v. Buzenius
525 U.S. 979 (1998) Cited 21 times
No. 97-945. November 9, 1998. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Marquez v. Screen Actors, ante, p. 33. Reported below: 124 F. 3d 788.
Buzenius v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
124 F.3d 788 (6th Cir. 1997) Cited 4 times
No. 96-5139 Argued: February 7, 1997 Decided and Filed: September 8, 1997 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 24 John C. Scully, (argued and briefed), National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Springfield, VA, for Petitioner. Aileen A. Armstrong, (briefed), Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Deborah E. Shrager, (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court Branch, Washington, DC, Margaret Gaines Neigus, (briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent
N.L.R.B. v. Shen-Mar Food Products, Inc.
557 F.2d 396 (4th Cir. 1977) Cited 6 times
Agreeing with NLRB that "the check-off provision was not a Union security device which would be subject to State law under Section 14(b)" of Taft-Hartley

County Concrete Corporation

7 Cited authorities

Communications Workers of America v. Beck

Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"

Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

Labor Board v. General Motors

Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause

H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

United Paperworkers Int'l. Union v. Buzenius

Buzenius v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

N.L.R.B. v. Shen-Mar Food Products, Inc.

Agreeing with NLRB that "the check-off provision was not a Union security device which would be subject to State law under Section 14(b)" of Taft-Hartley