§

Cott Beverages Inc.

16-CA-181144 (N.L.R.B. Oct. 7, 2019)
Cott Beverages Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    535 U.S. 137 (2002)   Cited 322 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that backpay awards to undocumented workers terminated in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ran counter to federal immigration law

  2. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  3. Southern S.S. Co. v. Labor Board

    316 U.S. 31 (1942)   Cited 160 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”

  4. T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    865 F.3d 265 (5th Cir. 2017)   Cited 3 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. 16-60284 C/w 16-60497 07-25-2017 T-MOBILE USA, INCORPORATED, Petitioner–Cross Respondent v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent–Cross Petitioner National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. MetroPCS Communications, Incorporated, Respondent Paul Alfred Salvatore, Esq., Mark David Harris, Proskauer, New York, NY, Irina Constantin, Mark Theodore, Proskauer, Los Angeles, CA, Daniel Jerome Davis, Proskauer, Washington, DC, Howard Shapiro, Esq., Proskauer, New Orleans, LA, for Petitioner. Linda

  5. Painting Co. v. N.L.R.B

    298 F.3d 492 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 00-1311, 00-1480. Argued: October 31, 2001. Decided and Filed: February 6, 2002. This decision was originally issued as an "unpublished decision" filed on February 6, 2002. On June 27, 2002, the court designated the opinion as one recommended for full-text publication. Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Cole, Circuit Judge. Bonnie I. O'Neil, Thomson Hine (argued), Daniel J. Brake (briefed), Scott, Scriven Wahoff, Columbus, OH, for Petitioner. Frederick C. Havard (argued and briefed), Aileen A

  6. N.L.R.B. v. McAllister Bros., Inc.

    819 F.2d 439 (4th Cir. 1987)   Cited 9 times

    No. 86-3860. Argued January 6, 1987. Decided May 20, 1987. Kenneth A. Margolis (Dretzin Kauff, P.C., New York City, Ober, Kaler, Grimes Shriver, on brief), for respondents. Richard A. Cohen, N.L.R.B. (Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. James M. Altman (Schulman Altman, New York City, on

  7. Campbell Soup Company v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    380 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 12 times
    In Campbell Soup Co. v. N.L.R.B., 380 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1967), we held invalid for vagueness and indefiniteness a ban on solicitation during "Company working hours."

  8. Section 301 - Short title

    21 U.S.C. § 301   Cited 2,473 times   48 Legal Analyses

    This chapter may be cited as the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. 21 U.S.C. § 301 June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §1, 52 Stat. 1040. STATUTORY NOTES AND RELATED SUBSIDIARIES EFFECTIVE DATE; POSTPONEMENT IN CERTAIN CASES Act June 23, 1939, ch. 242, §§1, 2, 53 Stat. 853, 854, provided that:"[SEC. 1] (a) The effective date of the following provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is hereby postponed until January 1, 1940: Sections 402(c) [342(c) of this title]; 403(e)(1) [343(e)(1) of this

  9. Section 502 - Bonding of officers and employees of labor organizations; amount, form, and placement of bonds; penalty for violation

    29 U.S.C. § 502   Cited 142 times

    (a) Every officer, agent, shop steward, or other representative or employee of any labor organization (other than a labor organization whose property and annual financial receipts do not exceed $5,000 in value), or of a trust in which a labor organization is interested, who handles funds or other property thereof shall be bonded to provide protection against loss by reason of acts of fraud or dishonesty on his part directly or through connivance with others. The bond of each such person shall be