§

Cott Beverages Inc.

16-CA-181144 (N.L.R.B. Sep. 12, 2017)
Cott Beverages Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    535 U.S. 137 (2002)   Cited 322 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that backpay awards to undocumented workers terminated in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ran counter to federal immigration law

  2. Southern S.S. Co. v. Labor Board

    316 U.S. 31 (1942)   Cited 160 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”

  3. N. Mem'l Health Care v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    860 F.3d 639 (8th Cir. 2017)   Cited 6 times

    No. 16-3433 No. 16-3657 06-21-2017 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. North Memorial Health Care, Respondent Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the petitioner/cross-respondent was Thomas R. Trachsel, of Minneapolis, MN. In addition to Mr. Trachsel, the following attorney(s) appeared on the petitioner/cross-respondent brief—Meggen E. Lindsay, of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who presented argument on

  4. T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    865 F.3d 265 (5th Cir. 2017)   Cited 3 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. 16-60284 C/w 16-60497 07-25-2017 T-MOBILE USA, INCORPORATED, Petitioner–Cross Respondent v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent–Cross Petitioner National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. MetroPCS Communications, Incorporated, Respondent Paul Alfred Salvatore, Esq., Mark David Harris, Proskauer, New York, NY, Irina Constantin, Mark Theodore, Proskauer, Los Angeles, CA, Daniel Jerome Davis, Proskauer, Washington, DC, Howard Shapiro, Esq., Proskauer, New Orleans, LA, for Petitioner. Linda

  5. Three D, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    629 F. App'x 33 (2d Cir. 2015)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that something "violates [the NLRA's interference provision] if it would reasonably tend to chill employees in the exercise of their [NLRA rights]"

  6. Flagstaff Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    715 F.3d 928 (D.C. Cir. 2013)   Cited 2 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 11–1326 11–1398. 2013-04-26 FLAGSTAFF MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Steven D. Wheeless argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Alan M. Bayless Feldman. Elizabeth A. Heaney, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel

  7. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  8. Nevada Service Emp. Union v. N.L.R.B

    358 F. App'x 783 (9th Cir. 2009)

    Nos. 08-70234, 08-70793, 08-71242. Argued and Submitted October 7, 2009. Filed November 17, 2009. Glenn Rothner, Esquire, Lisa Demidovich, Rothner, Segall Greenstone, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner. Cornele A. Overstreet, Esquire, NLRB-National Labor Relations Board, Phoenix, AZ, Joel C. Schochet, Esquire, NLRB-National Labor Relations Board, Las Vegas, NV, Regional Director, Esquire, National Labor Relations Board, Los Angeles, CA, Raymond Carey, Foley Lardner, LLP, Detroit, MI, for Respondent. Christopher

  9. Mathews Readymix, Inc. v. N. L. R. B

    165 F.3d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that uncontested coercive interrogation of replacement employees did not taint the employees' signatures on the decertification petition

  10. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,335 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  11. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,313 times   98 Legal Analyses
    Granting "employees" the right to unionize

  12. Section 301 - Short title

    21 U.S.C. § 301   Cited 2,477 times   49 Legal Analyses

    This chapter may be cited as the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. 21 U.S.C. § 301 June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §1, 52 Stat. 1040. STATUTORY NOTES AND RELATED SUBSIDIARIES EFFECTIVE DATE; POSTPONEMENT IN CERTAIN CASES Act June 23, 1939, ch. 242, §§1, 2, 53 Stat. 853, 854, provided that:"[SEC. 1] (a) The effective date of the following provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is hereby postponed until January 1, 1940: Sections 402(c) [342(c) of this title]; 403(e)(1) [343(e)(1) of this