Costco Wholesale Corp.

11 Cited authorities

Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
Community Hospitals of Cent Cal. v. N.L.R.B
335 F.3d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 24 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors
Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 17 times 2 Legal Analyses
Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally
Adtranz ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation, N.A. v. National Labor Relations
253 F.3d 19 (D.C. Cir. 2001) Cited 20 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding "derogatory racial or sexual epithets" are not entitled to NLRA protection even when made within the context of union-protected activity
Jochims v. National Labor
480 F.3d 1161 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 13 times 1 Legal Analyses
No. 05-1455. Argued January 22, 2007. Decided March 23, 2007. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Harold Craig Becker argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. Daniel A. Blitz, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Ronald E. Meisburg, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Meredith L. Jason, Supervisory
Cintas Corp. v. N.L.R.B
482 F.3d 463 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 13 times 2 Legal Analyses
Upholding National Labor Relations Board determination that an employer's rule that was likely to chill employees' discussion of wages constituted an unfair labor practice under the NLRA
Double Eagle Hotel Casino v. N.L.R.B
414 F.3d 1249 (10th Cir. 2005) Cited 10 times
Sustaining Board invalidation of policy defining "confidential information" to include salary information
Aroostook County v. N.L.R.B
81 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 18 times 1 Legal Analyses
Upholding NLRB's jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 158, part of the National Labor Relations Act, over an employer
N.L.R.B. v. Southern Maryland Hosp. Center
916 F.2d 932 (4th Cir. 1990) Cited 17 times
Noting that “the Board has on several occasions found that employers unreasonably chilled the exercise of their employees' Section 7 rights through excessive surveillance”
Radisson Plaza Minneapolis v. N.L.R.B
987 F.2d 1376 (8th Cir. 1993) Cited 13 times
Characterizing a proposal as made in bad faith because it "would have permitted [the employer] to unilaterally change working conditions whenever it pleased"

Costco Wholesale Corp.

11 Cited authorities

Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

Holding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors

Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally

Finding "derogatory racial or sexual epithets" are not entitled to NLRA protection even when made within the context of union-protected activity

Upholding National Labor Relations Board determination that an employer's rule that was likely to chill employees' discussion of wages constituted an unfair labor practice under the NLRA

Sustaining Board invalidation of policy defining "confidential information" to include salary information

Upholding NLRB's jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 158, part of the National Labor Relations Act, over an employer

Noting that “the Board has on several occasions found that employers unreasonably chilled the exercise of their employees' Section 7 rights through excessive surveillance”

Characterizing a proposal as made in bad faith because it "would have permitted [the employer] to unilaterally change working conditions whenever it pleased"